90 percent of everything : Usability Blog
Written by Harry Brignull

Archive for March, 2008

Opt-in / Opt-out upsell practices: the fine line between salesmanship and sneakiness

March 27th, 2008 by Harry BrignullAdd a comment

The debate about the ethics of opt in / opt out defaults in web forms never seems to go away. If you’ve read Chris Anderson’s Wired Article “Free! Why $0.00 Is the Future of Business“, then you might know where I’m going with this: Ryanair.

To quote from the article: “how can a flight across the English Channel be cheaper than the cab ride to your hotel?

  1. Cut costs: Ryanair boards and disembarks passengers from the tarmac to trim gate fees. The airline also negotiates lower access fees from less-popular airports eager for traffic.
  2. Ramp up the ancillary fees: Ryanair charges for in-flight food and beverages; assesses extra fees for preboarding, checked baggage, and flying with an infant; collects a share of car rentals and hotel reservations booked through the Web site; charges marketers for in-flight advertising; and levies a credit-card handling fee for all ticket purchases.
  3. Offset losses with higher fares: On popular travel days, the same flight can cost more than $100.”

Put simply, they are skating a fine line and have to work very hard on their upsell for ancillary fees (point 2 above). This boils down to the interaction design of their upsell page.

The way they do this is by alternating between default states of opt-in and opt-out for the choices on the upsell page. Easyjet also does the same thing. This is ethically dubious.

ryanmain3.jpg

I can understand their argument for doing this. In their minds, travel insurance and priority boarding are highly desirable products and they preselect them to save the user effort. To them, it’s persuasive salesmanship: “We have a number of options here for you sir, but we highly recommend priority boarding and insurance.”

However, there is a dark side to this design decision. You could argue that rather than being persuasive, it’s just plain sneaky. How would you feel if, when doing your weekly grocery shopping at the supermarket, one of the staff sneaked something into your basket. You’d be free to take it out as it rolled along the conveyor belt, but only if you were paying attention. And an extra tin of beans with your groceries, or travel insurance with your flight is a small additional cost so it’s very likely to slip by unnoticed.

You could liken it to old-fashionned bazzar-style bartering, where people who have their wits about them will a get lower price. Personally, I’m not so sure. While it might be a grey area, one way or another it’s going to annoy some customers. In the Independent last saturday, James Daley referred to the purchase process on Ryanair as an “enraging experience”. Others agree.

Bill Scott on refining search

March 26th, 2008 by Harry Brignull1 comment

Providing a good UI for sorting and filtering search results key fundamental to making your long tail work.

Bill Scott (Director of UI Engineering at Netflix) wrote a post on this yesterday with lots of video clips and screen grabs. Nice post Bill! (& good comments too)

Also check out Theresa Neil’s post on The Ultra Rich Search Experience.

It’s a bit of a wild-west situation at the moment, with designers experimenting with lots of different design patterns, and users gradually learning about the “search, then progressively refine” interaction style. This is bound to change over the coming months.

The Story of the Microsoft Office Ribbon by Jensen Harris

March 20th, 2008 by Harry Brignull2 comments

This is a great presentation by Jensen Harris, talking through the history of the MS Office UI and the design approach that brought about the ribbon. Contains nice shots of the early prototypes from slide 60 onwards.

Read more about it on Jensen’s blog

Google’s New Advanced Search: tidier, but how much better?

March 19th, 2008 by Harry Brignull1 comment

You may have noticed that Google changed their Advanced Search page eariler this month. The new version certainly is a lot tidier than the old one, which was a complete dogs dinner - take a look at a screen grab of the old version below, the green lines added to emphasise the layout issues.

google_advanced_search.gif

So is the new version better? In a nutshell, it’s tidier but not much better.

Back in January, Stephen Turbek wrote an interesting article on Advanced Search interfaces. Among other things, he pointed out that after a search is performed on Google, the “advancedness” is lost. You get taken back to the standard search results page, with a few boolean operators thrown into the search box.

There’s a certain degree of arrogance in this behaviour - the user says, very explicitly “I want you to help me to do an advanced search”. Google replies “Hmm, sure, but what you really to do is learn how to use boolean operators like a pro. That way you can use our standard search page instead, see?”

In fact the entire advanced search page is designed to teach you how to manually construct boolean searches rather than to help you do an advanced search. Take a look at the contextual help tips, for example. If you click a “tip” link it tells you how to construct a standard search with boolean operators. So, you ask for help on one thing, and it tells you help on another.

To use an analogy, if a kid asked you for help riding a bike, you’d give them stabilizers. You wouldn’t start telling them about clutch control on a motorbike straight away. So why isn’t Google giving novice searchers any love, compared to Yahoo and their rather nice AJAX search assist tool?

You know you’re a usability nerd when…

March 18th, 2008 by Harry BrignullAdd a comment

… When you chuckle to yourself about drop-down menu items. I laughed to myself about this one eariler when buying tickets for Mavis Staples at the Brighton Dome. I ended up going for “Group Captain”.

titles.gif

Subscribe to the 90percentofeverything link blog

March 18th, 2008 by Harry BrignullAdd a comment

You may have notice things have gone a bit quiet here recently. That’s because I’ve recently changed jobs, moving from Flow Interactive in London to Madgex in Brighton.

Although I haven’t been blogging, I’ve been sharing a lot of links on my link blog, via Google Reader. If you’re interested, you can subscribe to my link blog here. Even better, why not become my Google Reader friend? I’m harrybr@gmail.com, add me via gmail chat or follow these instructions.

Hey, can I borrow you multimedia computer to make a quick call?

March 5th, 2008 by Harry Brignull5 comments

According to this Article by Darren Waters, Nokia have started calling their devices “multimedia computers”.

This makes me laugh - can you actually imagine any normal person ever using that term? “Hey, can I borrow you multimedia computer to make a quick call?”

It really sums up the developer mindset that Nokia so badly need to shake off. While a technically accurate description, it’s never, ever going to catch on. Meanwhile Apple happily called their device an “iPhone”. By speaking the language of the end users, they’ve started permeating the english language like Coke, Hoover or Polaroid did. A much smarter move.

[Found via Putting people First]