<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: User-Centred Design is dead? Which bits?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.90percentofeverything.com/2008/04/21/user-centred-design-is-dead-which-bits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.90percentofeverything.com/2008/04/21/user-centred-design-is-dead-which-bits/</link>
	<description>User Experience Design &#38; Research, written by Harry Brignull</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 03:20:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top posts this year on on 90percentofeverything.com- 90 Percent of Everything</title>
		<link>http://www.90percentofeverything.com/2008/04/21/user-centred-design-is-dead-which-bits/comment-page-1/#comment-119121</link>
		<dc:creator>Top posts this year on on 90percentofeverything.com- 90 Percent of Everything</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.90percentofeverything.com/2008/04/21/user-centred-design-is-dead-which-bits/#comment-119121</guid>
		<description>[...] User Centred Design is dead? Which bits?: this debate seems to go on and on. We&#8217;ve been talking about it at some of the UX-Brighton gatherings &#8211; a lot of the confusion seems to tie into how you define UCD and the alternatives. Have you read We tried baseball and it didn&#8217;t work by Ron Jeffries? It&#8217;s amusingly relevant to this debate. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] User Centred Design is dead? Which bits?: this debate seems to go on and on. We&#8217;ve been talking about it at some of the UX-Brighton gatherings &#8211; a lot of the confusion seems to tie into how you define UCD and the alternatives. Have you read We tried baseball and it didn&#8217;t work by Ron Jeffries? It&#8217;s amusingly relevant to this debate. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How much does design matter? &#124; AccMan</title>
		<link>http://www.90percentofeverything.com/2008/04/21/user-centred-design-is-dead-which-bits/comment-page-1/#comment-62701</link>
		<dc:creator>How much does design matter? &#124; AccMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.90percentofeverything.com/2008/04/21/user-centred-design-is-dead-which-bits/#comment-62701</guid>
		<description>[...] User-Centred Design is dead? Which bits? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] User-Centred Design is dead? Which bits? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.90percentofeverything.com/2008/04/21/user-centred-design-is-dead-which-bits/comment-page-1/#comment-53921</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.90percentofeverything.com/2008/04/21/user-centred-design-is-dead-which-bits/#comment-53921</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid the entire premise of Spool&#039;s argument is based on the assumption that UCD is a methodology, rather than a broad philosophy. &quot;design dogma, methodology and formal process were inferior to a well understood shared vision, frequent user feedback and a robust tool box of design tricks &amp; techniques.&quot; 

Frequent user feedback? Robust tool box? What exactly does he think UCD is if not this? I saw him talk at CHI recently, and although he is an entertaining speaker, there&#039;s more than a nugget of bad thinking at the heart of many of his arguments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid the entire premise of Spool&#8217;s argument is based on the assumption that UCD is a methodology, rather than a broad philosophy. &#8220;design dogma, methodology and formal process were inferior to a well understood shared vision, frequent user feedback and a robust tool box of design tricks &amp; techniques.&#8221; </p>
<p>Frequent user feedback? Robust tool box? What exactly does he think UCD is if not this? I saw him talk at CHI recently, and although he is an entertaining speaker, there&#8217;s more than a nugget of bad thinking at the heart of many of his arguments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
