<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Eye tracking: some thoughts from an ex eye-tracking researcher</title> <atom:link href="http://www.90percentofeverything.com/2007/11/26/eye-tracking-some-thoughts-from-an-ex-eye-tracking-researcher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.90percentofeverything.com/2007/11/26/eye-tracking-some-thoughts-from-an-ex-eye-tracking-researcher/</link> <description>User Experience Design &#38; Research, written by Harry Brignull</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:50:52 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Clear Reporting &#38; Critical Thinking: Why User Experience Needs to Remember its Roots in Psychology</title><link>http://www.90percentofeverything.com/2007/11/26/eye-tracking-some-thoughts-from-an-ex-eye-tracking-researcher/comment-page-1/#comment-140068</link> <dc:creator>Clear Reporting &#38; Critical Thinking: Why User Experience Needs to Remember its Roots in Psychology</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 09:40:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.90percentofeverything.com/2007/11/26/eye-tracking-some-thoughts-from-an-ex-eye-tracking-researcher/#comment-140068</guid> <description>[...] Share the data: interview transcripts, data logs, everything goes into an appendix or somewhere online where people can critique it. Never hide behind percentages, and never, ever dress up small-scale qualitative usability studies as more than they really are. Even if you use an eye tracker. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Share the data: interview transcripts, data logs, everything goes into an appendix or somewhere online where people can critique it. Never hide behind percentages, and never, ever dress up small-scale qualitative usability studies as more than they really are. Even if you use an eye tracker. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dr. Pete</title><link>http://www.90percentofeverything.com/2007/11/26/eye-tracking-some-thoughts-from-an-ex-eye-tracking-researcher/comment-page-1/#comment-34761</link> <dc:creator>Dr. Pete</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:17:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.90percentofeverything.com/2007/11/26/eye-tracking-some-thoughts-from-an-ex-eye-tracking-researcher/#comment-34761</guid> <description>Excellent post, and some great food for thought. I&#039;m glad to see others wrestling with the relative merits of techniques and keeping an open mind. I&#039;ve been bothered lately by the number of usability specialists who seem to cling to one technique, defending it to the death and attacking any other technique that comes along. Any tool that helps me understand my users has value, and every tool has weaknesses and should be viewed critically and user carefully.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, and some great food for thought. I&#8217;m glad to see others wrestling with the relative merits of techniques and keeping an open mind. I&#8217;ve been bothered lately by the number of usability specialists who seem to cling to one technique, defending it to the death and attacking any other technique that comes along. Any tool that helps me understand my users has value, and every tool has weaknesses and should be viewed critically and user carefully.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
